[PATCH 2/2] Add tests for the long double version of ecvt and fcvt

[Gabriel F. T. Gomes]

On Thu, 01 Nov 2018, Joseph Myers wrote:

>I think it would be a good idea to clean up this test so it doesn't return 
>a count of errors (with no obvious reason that count couldn't be 77 and so 
>wrongly interpreted as UNSUPPORTED), so avoiding the new test sharing that 
>deficiency with the old one.

Thanks for pointing that out.  I have posted an updated patch.