glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x

Joseph Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue May 8 22:26:00 GMT 2018


On Tue, 8 May 2018, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:

> Any chance we can get better glibc<=>asan cross testing and collaboration?

My comments in February still apply: to avoid breakage going undetected 
until too late, someone familiar with asan development should be running a 
bot to find problems within a few days, not after a release, and 
contributions of continuous testing are welcome; even our existing bots 
running execution tests aren't properly maintained.

https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-02/msg00633.html
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-02/msg00645.html

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list