[PATCH 3/9] Use SCANF_ISOC99_A instead of _IO_FLAGS2_SCANF_STD.
Gabriel F. T. Gomes
gabriel@inconstante.eti.br
Mon Mar 26 15:35:00 GMT 2018
On Wed, 07 Mar 2018, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>Change the callers of __vfscanf_internal and __vfwscanf_internal that
>want C99-compliant behavior to communicate this via the new flags
>argument, rather than setting bits on the FILE object. This also
>means these functions do not need to do their own locking.
Looks good to me.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list