[PATCH v2] nisplus: Correct pwent parsing issue and resulting compilation error [BZ #23266]

[DJ Delorie]

"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com> writes:
>> +    if (len > 0)
>>        strncpy (first_unused, numstr, len);
>
>  Do you expect GCC to start complaining here sometime even if it cannot 
> statically prove that `len' can sometimes be zero, which seems the case 
> here?

I wouldn't expect gcc to complain here, no, but... some of the things
gcc *does* complain about have surprised me in the past.  So this is
just my paranoia asserting itself :-)

(and function calls used to be expensive, so my old optimizing tricks
are speaking up ;)

> But as you write, is it worth it?

I doubt it.  Just being thorough.