[PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation

[Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho]

Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>>
>> For w_scalb you'd need to 
>> treat the existing w_scalb*_compat templates like the other compat ones - 
>
> I didn't follow completely your proposal here.
> Are you saying that ldbl-128ibm-compat also needs a w_scalbf128_compat?

Sorry.  I hit send too soon.
Please ignore this question.  :-D

-- 
Tulio Magno