[PATCH 0/9] Introduce ieee128 symbols and redirections
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
tuliom@linux.ibm.com
Wed Jun 13 20:25:00 GMT 2018
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> As a general principle, I'd suggest using a consistent naming convention
> for all the ieee128 function variants being added in both libc and libm.
> So, if __ieee128_* is used in libc that would indicate functions such as
> __ieee128_cosl in libm, for example. (For the libm functions this is
> presumably mainly a matter of how a few macros get defined.)
Ack. We're planning to use the format __*ieee128 everywhere.
However, there are cases that need special treatment and will be slightly
different, e.g.: __nextowardf_to_ieee128 and __nexttoward_to_ieee128.
Is that OK?
--
Tulio Magno
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list