[PATCH] Fix Linux fcntl OFD locks for non-LFS architectures (BZ#20251)

[Adhemerval Zanella]

On 01/06/2018 17:50, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> It is not really new, since for architectures with default LFS support this is
>> transparent and for architectures with non-default LFS my understanding is 
>> functions with *64 suffix are expected to handle cancellation as the non-LFS.
> 
> *64 functions are generally expected to be analogous with the 
> corresponding non-LFS functions, yes.  I think the new fcntl64 API still 
> merits a specific NEWS entry, just like other new function APIs.
> 

Alright, I will add a NEWS entry.