[PATCH] Keep expected behaviour for [a-z] and [A-z] (Bug 23393).
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Jul 25 22:50:00 GMT 2018
On 07/25/2018 11:35 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> I have committed only the most conservative fix for this issue, which is
> to deinterlace the lower and upper case ranges.
>
> I think we are too late to commit rational ranges, and we can do that in
> 2.29 when it opens. Right now I want to remove the blocker that is causing
> regressions for en_US.UTF-8 scripts that use [a-z], and [A-Z].
How is this the most conservative fix, relative to glibc 2.27 upstream?
[a-z] still matches lots of non-ASCII characters, which it did not before.
When I meant that we left regression-fixing territory, I was talking
about the locales which had iso14651_t1_common customizations.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list