[PATCHv3] Expected behaviour for a-z, A-Z, and 0-9 (Bug 23393).
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Jul 25 20:31:00 GMT 2018
On 07/25/2018 10:25 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 07/25/2018 04:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 07/25/2018 05:54 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> Attaching it as swbz23393v3.tar.gz to avoid spam rejection.
>>
>> Quick comment. The middle line here adds trailing whitespace:
>>
>> -Â { "[a-z]|[^a-z]", "\xcb\xa2", REG_EXTENDED, 2,
>> +
>> +    The U+02DA RING ABOVE is chosen because it's not in [ï½-ã]. */
>
> Thanks. I'll fix this with v4.
I have verified that localedata/locales/iso14651_t1_common is just a
reordering (except for the new comments).
localedata/locales/tr_TR is more complicated, but looks like an
order-only change for me too.
> I had to fix the following locales:
>
> modified: localedata/locales/ar_SA
> modified: localedata/locales/km_KH
> modified: localedata/locales/lo_LA
> modified: localedata/locales/or_IN
> modified: localedata/locales/sl_SI
> modified: localedata/locales/th_TH
Do you have the actual locale names handy? localedata/SUPPORTED
contains charsets, but I'm not sure if the translation to locale names
is completely regular.
> They all re-arranged ASCII character collation element ordering like tr_TR,
> and so they needed manual fixing.
>
> Could you please add these locales to your tester?
I will try. I already have an xtests part, and these probably need to
go there as well.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list