[PATCH] update libm-test-ulps for new exp

[Joseph Myers]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:

> in the long term i'd prefer if there was a generic ulp error
> file and a target could just say it uses the generic bounds

That runs into e.g. different long double formats (so you'd need ulps 
files to specify format names, not "ldouble", which is a good idea anyway, 
and then you'd need to select appropriate files depending on long double 
format - and you don't really want to duplicate the sysdeps etc. logic 
that selects long double formats, but you also have the tables of ulps 
generated for the manual, which does not depend on the glibc configuration 
and does not know what configurations use what sysdeps directories, so 
maybe the tables in the manual would also need rearranging somehow to have 
generic and architecture-specific ulps).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com