[PATCH v2] malloc: Remove malloc hooks (Bug 23328)

[DJ Delorie]

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> Correct.  At that point, you are still single-threaded, so you don't
> need all that complicated synchronization.  (You might need a dummy
> allocation for bootstrapping, though.)

I'd still need the recursion check.  There's no real advantage to
replacing atomic ops with non-atomic ops, other than readability.