glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x

[Florian Weimer]

On 02/22/2018 01:56 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Split stack support already requires a stack limit in the TCB.  This could be reused even if split stacks are not used.  We'd need to add another field for the other stack end, though.
> Couldn't we embedded it on pthread_t instead? I rather avoid changing TCB, since it
> requires changing the ABI for some architectures (aarch64 is an example where
> split-stack field is being added in a different manner).

It will be part of the ABI no matter where we put it.  I don't have a 
strong preference in this regard.

Thanks,
Florian