glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x

[Florian Weimer]

On 02/21/2018 10:57 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> My view off the ABI your proposed is for stack boundaries and static TLS part
> it seems reasonable: both query functions initial descriptions are
> straightforward and internal implementation should require only reading some
> internal states.

glibc does not know the stack boundaries, though.  We do not require 
that applications use the glibc-allocated stack .  (We do, however, 
require that applications use the glibc-allocated thread control block.)

Thanks,
Florian