Retroactively Resolving Bugs

Carlos O'Donell carlos@redhat.com
Thu Feb 22 08:57:00 GMT 2018


On 02/22/2018 12:12 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2018 01:37 PM, Rical Jasan wrote:
>> I noticed BZ #16335 [0] was resolved by 6a3962c4a408 (Document missing
>> feature test macros; [1]), but I wasn't intentionally working on that
>> bug so it wasn't annotated accordingly.  I see that
>> scripts/list-fixed-bugs.py will catch it if I close it (FIXED with
>> target milestone), but should I also update the ChangeLog entry to
>> include the [BZ #] tag?  (While the original commit can't be amended, I
>> could also reference it in the commit message for the ChangeLog update.)
> 
> Updating the ChangeLog should be fine IMO, encouraged in fact as long as
> we are maintaining the ChangeLog.

Agreed. Please feel free, on master, to fix anything that is missing
bug numbers.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list