[PATCH] Locales: Use CLDR matching thousands separator

Marko Myllynen myllynen@redhat.com
Tue Dec 18 13:27:00 GMT 2018


Hi Florian,

On 18/12/2018 11.13, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rafal Luzynski:
> 
>> It looks to me they are going to accept NNBSP but definitely, if they
>> say that they want to stick with NBSP or they decide to stop working
>> on the issue then we will have to switch to NBSP.
> 
> To me it would suggest that we should re-evaluate CLDR as a data source.

Care to elaborate a bit? Do you mean that should CLDR decide using NBSP
then glibc should reconsider using CLDR as a data source in this
particular case or in general? Wouldn't it be beneficial to follow CLDR
regardless of their choice of NBSP or NNBSP?

Thanks,

-- 
Marko Myllynen



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list