[PATCH] malloc/malloc.c: Mitigate null-byte overflow attacks
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Aug 16 15:10:00 GMT 2018
On 01/15/2018 08:56 PM, Moritz Eckert wrote:
> diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
> index f5aafd2c05..d6ebfafd9a 100644
> --- a/malloc/malloc.c
> +++ b/malloc/malloc.c
> @@ -4288,6 +4288,8 @@ _int_free (mstate av, mchunkptr p, int have_lock)
> prevsize = prev_size (p);
> size += prevsize;
> p = chunk_at_offset(p, -((long) prevsize));
> + if (__builtin_expect (chunksize(p) != prevsize, 0))
> + malloc_printerr ("corrupted size vs. prev_size");
> unlink(av, p, bck, fwd);
> }
>
> @@ -4449,6 +4451,8 @@ static void malloc_consolidate(mstate av)
> prevsize = prev_size (p);
> size += prevsize;
> p = chunk_at_offset(p, -((long) prevsize));
> + if (__builtin_expect (chunksize(p) != prevsize, 0))
> + malloc_printerr ("corrupted size vs. prev_size");
> unlink(av, p, bck, fwd);
> }
I think it would make sense to have different error messages in both
cases, to make crash reports more meaningful. And __glibc_unlikely
should be used.
Otherwise, it looks good to me. DJ, could you commit this in Moritz'
name with a proper changelog entry? It does not raise to the threshold
of requiring copyright assignment.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list