[PATCH] New configure option --disable-libcrypt.
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Apr 17 10:21:00 GMT 2018
On 04/16/2018 05:56 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Let me see if I understand what you have in mind: In
> --disable-libcrypt mode, we would preserve _XOPEN_CRYPT, with value 1,
> and the prototype for crypt in unistd.h.
My main proposal is preserving the prototype for crypt, under
_GNU_SOURCE if necessary (without defining _XOPEN_CRYPT).
I just don't see value in the friction caused by dropping the definition.
> We would also preserve the
> prototypes for encrypt and setkey, but maybe with
> __attribute__((deprecated)).
I'm less concerned about these two functions. We can do there whatever
we think is best from a standard compliance perspective, I think. There
simply aren't enough users to make a difference, I think. This is very
different for the crypt function.
> We just wouldn't provide crypt.h or libcrypt.
Exactly.
> It's not a conformance violation for us to continue
> defining _XOPEN_CRYPT as 1 because, as long as you get libcrypt from
> _somewhere_, it will work at runtime. Is that right?
Right.
It could still be a conformance violation for setkey/encrypt because
current libxcrypt (at least the version in Fedora) does not provide the
functions anymore for linking:
$ eu-readelf --symbols=.dynsym /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 | grep encrypt
38: 000000000000b330 20 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 12
encrypt_r@GLIBC_2.2.5
52: 000000000000b360 16 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 12
encrypt@GLIBC_2.2.5
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list