[PATCH] Use fabs(f/l) rather than __fabs

[Joseph Myers]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:

> Right so there are no namespace issues. But what about localplt issues
> due to the disabling of fabsl inlining? I can't find any renaming, so why are
> there no local plt failures on ppc soft-float?

Because both fabsl and copysignl are listed in 
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/nofpu/localplt.data.  If the GCC 
bug is fixed and the -fno-builtin-fabsl use made conditional, then fabsl 
would also need to be marked optional in localplt.data as copysignl is.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com