[PATCH] ia64: refresh ulps

Joseph Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Mon Sep 18 22:00:00 GMT 2017


On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:16:24 +0000
> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 16 Sep 2017, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > 
> > > After regen 'make check results':  
> > 
> > To confirm: you truncated the libm-test-ulps file to regenerate from 
> > scratch, so that ulps decreases were possible as well as increases?  
> > (Though since ia64 uses mainly ia64-specific function implementations, 
> > there are less likely to be decreases than for other architectures 
> > regenerating after a long time.)
> 
> Yes, it was ran against truncated 'sysdeps/ia64/fpu/libm-test-ulps'.

Thanks.  In that case it should be considered obvious to commit and I 
suppose Mike will do so.

> Will do. I was not sure to file bugs before regenerating ulps
> because many test failures are result of missing data (and not
> a behaviour difference).

Indeed, when it's just missing / out of date ulps that's not something to 
file a bug for.  If it shows with current ulps, it probably *is* a 
user-visible libm bug that should be reported.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list