[PATCH 7/9] posix: Consolidate glob implementation
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Sep 12 14:29:00 GMT 2017
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Sep 05 2017, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > * On Linux all implementation now uses a default one with the exception
> > of alpha (which requires specific versioning) and s390-32 (which
> > different than other 32 bits with support for v2.1 symbol does not
> > add a compat one).
>
> This drops the default glob64 symbol from s390 (the glob64@GLIBC_2.1
> symbol is now hidden).
Does this mean we don't have any tests that verify a call to glob64 can be
linked (and works)? If so, such tests should be added (generally, all
non-compat symbols ought to be tested).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list