[PATCH v2] Use execveat syscall in fexecve

[Adhemerval Zanella]

On 11/09/2017 17:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Joseph Myers:
> 
>> We have the ENOSYS code there and the subsequent fallback that will 
>> eventually need cleaning up *anyway*.  Having the __ASSUME_* macro makes 
>> it obvious in future exactly what changes should be made for the cleanup 
>> and exactly when it is possible to do that cleanup.  I think having such 
>> macros for any case with fallback code that can be cleaned up in future is 
>> a good idea for that reason.
> 
> Agreed.  As long as there is an expectation that we will eventually
> bump the minimum kernel requirement, __ASSUME_* macros are the way to
> go.
> 

Fair enough then.