[PATCH] Optimized generic expf and exp2f
Szabolcs Nagy
szabolcs.nagy@arm.com
Wed Sep 6 09:23:00 GMT 2017
On 05/09/17 21:58, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> you mentioned x86 data.. is that based on current git after
>> the recent optimizations (on a cpu with fma)?
>
> Really you need to compare with both the fma and non-fma versions (and
> compare the C version built both with and without fma, since one
> possibility would be that the C version can replace the x86_64 ones but
> should be built twice, with and without fma, to achieve that replacement).
>
i don't have a machine with fma, i tested it on
an older cpu (but i did test against git tip,
using gcc-7).
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list