Supporting CLONE_NEWPID namespaces and process-shared mutexes supported?

Torvald Riegel triegel@redhat.com
Wed Oct 25 12:34:00 GMT 2017


On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 14:45 -0700, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> We use tid's in the internals of a mutex to identify owner. This is
> considered unique for the system (though it has an ABA pid-reuse
> problem).

The owner is only required for some mutex types.  Are these types
required for the intended use cases?



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list