[PATCH][BZ #21326] Ensure C99 and C11 interfaces are available for C++

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Mon Oct 9 14:09:00 GMT 2017


On 09/10/17 16:02 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>On 10/09/2017 04:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>>>I think there is a preexisting issue here which will trigger macro 
>>>redefinition warnings with -Wsystem-headers.  But perhaps I'm 
>>>mistaken.
>>
>>Even though both definitions are identical?
>>
>>I think there's no redefinition warning for:
>>
>>#define __USE_ISOC99 1
>>#define __USE_ISOC99 1
>>
>>Only if the macro's replacement-list differs on the redefinition.
>
>Oh, I didn't know that.  Thanks.
>
>>>Apart from that, the substance of the patch looks okay to me.
>>
>>Thanks. Here's an updated patch against current master, with the fixed
>>indentation.
>
>This version looks good to me.  Can you install this yourself, or 
>shall I install it for you?

I don't have commit access, so would be grateful if you can do it.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list