Last Responder Wins in Patchwork?
Rical Jasan
ricaljasan@pacific.net
Sat May 27 11:36:00 GMT 2017
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I finally had time to roam around
some more in patchwork, and have some follow up.
On 11/30/2016 06:03 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 07:56 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Rical Jasan wrote:
>>> Why does this say I'm the submitter?
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/12829/
>>
>> Because the message it is based on is one where you included a patch.
>> Note the "I've attached the beginnings of how I would approach it" in the
>> first message shown.
Seems that even text in the message that looks like a diff incurs a
patch in patchwork:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/20500/
That's brutal.
> Mark it RFC if that's what is is, and then re-post a new patch
> under a new thread if that's the way you want to go.
>
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow
"Not Applicable" is probably better in both the above cases, I think.
I'll be updating all my noise in the patchwork queue shortly.
Rical
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list