[updated patch] malloc per-thread cache ready for review

[Florian Weimer]

On 05/12/2017 08:28 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
>> Sorry, that's not what I meant.  The thread cache adds some
>> workload-independent per-thread overhead to store the cache.  We should
>> document how large that overhead is.
> 
> That's the math I put in the tunables docs.

Sorry, I missed that.  It addresses my question.

> Or did you mean the size of the table itself?  Or the __thread data
> size?

The additional __thread data is minuscule, right?

Thanks,
Florian