[PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h

Torvald Riegel triegel@redhat.com
Tue Mar 28 08:08:00 GMT 2017


On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:10 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I've reviewed the DRs and your comments below.  I agree with
> your view and just for clarity provide some additional comments
> of my own.

Thanks!

> There's been a lot of talk over the last few WG14 meetings about
> the whole threads section needing an overhaul.  I don't know if
> anyone is actually working on it but if it were to happen (for
> C2X) there is some risk that an implementation coded to the C11
> spec not conforming to the cleaned up and improved C2X spec.

I'd hope that they wouldn't deviate from what C++ specifies.  I'm
monitoring C++ changes, including whether anything would result in
required changes for glibc.  IOW, if C doesn't deviate from C++, we
shouldn't need additional changes just for C.




More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list