[PING] [PATCH 1/5] S390: Add new hwcap values for new cpu architecture - arch12.

[Stefan Liebler]

On 06/27/2017 02:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 08:12 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 06/27/2017 02:06 PM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2017 08:51 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>>>> The new hwcap values indicate support for:
>>>> - Vector packed decimal facility
>>>> - Vector enhancements facility 1
>>>> - Guarded storage facility
>>>>
>>>> Note: arch12 is NOT the official name of the new CPU.
>>>> It refers to the edition number of the Principle of Operations manual.
>>>>
>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>>      * sysdeps/s390/dl-procinfo.c (_dl_s390_cap_flags):
>>>>      Add vxd, vxe, gs flag.
>>>>      * sysdeps/s390/dl-procinfo.h: Add HWCAP_S390_VXD, HWCAP_S390_VXE,
>>>>      HWCAP_S390_GS capability.
>>>>      * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/bits/hwcap.h
>>>>      (HWCAP_S390_VXD, HWCAP_S390_VXE, HWCAP_S390_GS): Define.
>>>> ---
>>>>    sysdeps/s390/dl-procinfo.c                | 5 +++--
>>>>    sysdeps/s390/dl-procinfo.h                | 5 ++++-
>>>>    sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/bits/hwcap.h | 3 +++
>>>>    3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> PING
>>
>> FWIW, I think you can assume consensus for such s390-specific changes,
>> especially if they do not alter ABI (so that we can revert them if
>> necessary, without recompiling applications).
>>
>> “In general this maintainership means that you have the discretion to
>> assume consensus for a change of your own without waiting for review or
>> comments on consensus.”
>>
>> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS>
> 
> Agreed. Unless you are looking for additional review, as a machine maintainer
> you have assumed consensus and are responsible for your changes :-)
> 
Okay. Then I've committed it.

Thanks.
Stefan