manual: Complete @standards in lang.texi.

[Rical Jasan]

On 06/19/2017 07:53 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Rical Jasan wrote:
> 
>> So my question is, does, "OK, but.." mean, "commit and don't forget to
>> ... later", or, "looks good but also needs ... first"?  I can cut the
>> conversion out easily enough and still complete the annotations.
> 
> In this case, "commit and don't forget to ... later" together with "while 
> there isn't such a list, you need to be extra careful about being 
> consistent about naming of standards in annotations you add or refine, and 
> about what if anything should be listed in @standards in the way of 
> information about a function's history beyond which standards supported by 
> the glibc headers it's in".

Duly noted, and committed (b8216e82).

Thank you,
Rical