[PATCH 1/1] Added new Locale bho_NP

[AKHILESH KUMAR]

> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_COLLATE
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_TIME
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_NUMERIC
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_MONETARY
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_MESSAGES
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_PAPER
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_NAME
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_ADDRESS
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_TELEPHONE
> > +category "i18n:2012";LC_MEASUREMENT
> > +END LC_IDENTIFICATION
> > +
> > +LC_CTYPE
> > +copy "ne_NP"
> > +END LC_CTYPE
>  
> copy "bho_IN"
>  
> seems better, what do you think? The LC_CTYPE of ne_NP just does the
> standard copy "i18n", copy "bho_IN" would do copy "hi_IN" which does
> something with devanagari digits.
  
  Agree 
  
> > +LC_COLLATE
> > +copy "ne_NP"
> +END LC_COLLATE
> copy "bho_IN" will give the identical result but seems more logical.
  Agree   
> > +LC_MONETARY
> > +copy "ne_NP"
> > +END LC_MONETARY
> > +
> > +LC_NUMERIC
> > +copy "ne_NP"
> > +END LC_NUMERIC
> > +
> > +LC_TIME
> > +copy "bho_IN"
> > +END LC_TIME
>  
> OK.
>  
> > +LC_MESSAGES
> > +copy "hi_IN"
> > +END LC_MESSAGES
>  
> Maybe better copy "bho_IN"? Although it makes no difference here.

  Agree 
  All review Comments are integrated please find updated patch
  https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-07/msg00948.html
  
> > +LC_PAPER
> > +copy "ne_NP"

Akhilesh