[PATCH] Avoid backtrace from __stack_chk_fail [BZ #12189]

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Tue Jul 11 20:25:00 GMT 2017


On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> +CFLAGS-tst-ssp-1.c = -fstack-protector
>
> This should be -fstack-protector-all, in case the the stack protector
> heuristics do not instrument a thirty-byte array.

Does GCC 4.9 support  -fstack-protector-all?

-- 
H.J.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list