[PATCH 2/2] Erase GLIBC_TUNABLES for setxid processes when tunables is disabled
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Jan 31 13:22:00 GMT 2017
On 01/29/2017 06:11 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> In addition to this, I'll post a patch for earlier releases (2.24 and
> older) to add GLIBC_TUNABLES to unsecure_envvars (is unsecure even a
> word?) so that they too don't end up passing on unsafe tunables.
I expected a patch with a preprocessor condition for unsecvars.h for
glibc 2.25. Wouldn't this have the same effect than your tunables-based
changes?
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list