[PATCH] [BZ #20985] robust mutexes: Fix broken x86 assembly by removing it
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Fri Jan 13 10:01:00 GMT 2017
On 12/22/2016 12:23 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 12:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 12/22/2016 11:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
>>> (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New.
>>
>> This needs to be documented in the code. It seems the code always
>> defines it as 0, so it's not clear to me why it makes sense to define it
>> at all (twice even).
>
> This should be defined differently when pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c
> includes the file; I just noticed that it doesn't do that.
>
> Is the patch OK besides that (ie, so after fixing that oversight and
> adding a suitable comment to the definition of
> LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER?).
Do we already have a test case which detects the bug you introduced?
Would you please post a consolidated patch rebased to current master?
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list