[PATCH v3 00/17] Consolidate Linux sysvipc implementation
Yury Norov
ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Thu Jan 5 20:57:00 GMT 2017
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, December 9, 2016 10:30:53 AM CET Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > Adhemerval,
> >
> > It looks like you may have to tweek your change to test-skeleton.c in
> > this patch. The FAIL_EXIT macro was moved from test-skeleton.c
> > to support/check.h so I assume your new FAIL_UNSUPPORTED macro should
> > be moved there as well.
> >
> > I have been doing aarch64 and x86 builds here with your patch and have
> > not had any problems except with my new aarch64 ILP32 code. There I
> > had to change the definition of __IPC_64 in the new header
> > file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ipc_priv.h from:
> >
> > #define __IPC_64 0x0
> >
> > to:
> >
> > #ifdef __LP64__
> > # define __IPC_64 0x0
> > #else /* __ILP32 */
> > # define __IPC_64 0x100
> > #endif
>
> Huh?
>
> I would hope that this is not really needed, it looks like
> a kernel bug. The old style IPC has been deprecated for so
> long that nothing should need to pass the 0x100 flag, unless
> it dates back to the last century.
>
> Do we need to override the version parsing in the kernel?
Hi Arnd,
It's not completely clear what you do mean here. I think you mean that
function that parses flags should be changed, but Steve noticed that
it may also mean that you want to replace compat sys_msg{ctl,rcv,snd}
in generic unistd,h with non-compat versions. If so, it should be
probably done before taking aarch64/ilp32.
Yury
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list