Update copyright dates not handled by scripts/update-copyrights [committed]

[Joseph Myers]

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Paul Eggert wrote:

> Unfortunately there's a problem with this approach: it's a pain to merge. This
> is because different branches can have different committed ChangeLog files,
> which are mostly autogenerated but contain some hand edits. The autogenerated

Since in practice we don't do point releases from branches in glibc, with 
my proposal (absent persuading the GCS maintainers of the non-utility for 
ChangeLogs in certain cases) ChangeLogs would most likely only ever be 
updated on master, not on branches.  Branches would have commit messages 
following the relevant conventions, but the script probably wouldn't be 
run there.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com