glibc 2.25 machine status?

Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh@gotplt.org
Fri Feb 3 13:14:00 GMT 2017


On Friday 03 February 2017 06:41 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> I think Dave or the distributions should make that choice, but if it's really
> broken then fixing it would be better than nothing.

That is fair, I reckon machine maintainers have a final say on what goes
into their part of the code base anyway.  What I said is my
recommendation as release manager since changing whole subroutines
during freeze is not trivial.

Siddhesh



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list