glibc 2.25 machine status?
Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh@gotplt.org
Fri Feb 3 13:14:00 GMT 2017
On Friday 03 February 2017 06:41 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> I think Dave or the distributions should make that choice, but if it's really
> broken then fixing it would be better than nothing.
That is fair, I reckon machine maintainers have a final say on what goes
into their part of the code base anyway. What I said is my
recommendation as release manager since changing whole subroutines
during freeze is not trivial.
Siddhesh
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list