glibc 2.25 machine status?
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 13:10:00 GMT 2017
On 02/03/2017 06:08 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So the summary for status is now as follows:
>
> - There are failures on SPARC32 that need fixing
This should not block the release and I've told Dave Miller (in the
test status request thread) that he should just make whatever changes
he needs making since it's restricted to the SPARC32 backend. Anything
is better than broken.
> - I am not clear on the resolution status of pr#20915. It appeared
> that there was consensus on reverting one of the hunks from commit
> 17af5da9 but there seem to be differences in that
My only goal today is to try fix this with a minimum of change and
retest across all the affected arches. I have a bunch of boxes on loan
to use for that.
> - I have posted a tunables test case fix that I'll commit soon if
> nobody objects
Your patches there look good to me.
> Pr 20915 is the only blocker so provided that it is resolved in time, I
> intend to cut a release this Sunday. If the blocker is not resolved in
> time, the release will be on the day or one day after the blocker is
> resolved, depending on how it aligns with my timezone and/or my sleep
> pattern at that time.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list