glibc 2.25 machine status?
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 13:08:00 GMT 2017
On 02/02/2017 08:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Carlos, I ran some 32-bit Sparc v9 tests, there are math test failures
> which are easy to fix (all of the sparcv9 and VIS3 fmin/fmax assembler
> routines do not generate exceptions properly). The fix is simply to
> remove them.
>
> A more difficult case is the sparcv9 version of s_lrint.S which
> sometimes erroneously generates inexact excepations.
>
Thanks.
Siddhesh won't be cutting the branch until Sunday because of a few other
last minute blocker's that we're clearing off the decks.
Therefore if you want to commit the SPARC-only changes, please do so,
and post the test results to the wiki?
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.25
Anything in the wiki is better than nothing. Just saying what system
you used for testing and compiler+binutils+kernel combination is useful
information for others.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list