[PATCH] support: Define support_static_assert for use from C and C++
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Sun Dec 31 20:33:00 GMT 2017
On 12/31/2017 09:25 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> +/* Static assertion, under a common name for both C++ and C11. */
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> +# define support_static_assert static_assert
>> +#else
>> +# define support_static_assert _Static_assert
>> +#endif
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to do this?
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> # define _Static_assert static_assert
> #endif
>
> and then use _Static_assert everywhere? Or do it the other way around.
> It seems odd to introduce yet another name "support_static_assert" for
> this concept.
_Static_assert is reserved in C++ as well, so I don't want to touch it.
The GCC headers might eventually use it in a way which is not strictly
equivalent to static_assert. I don't feel very strongly about this, though.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list