[PATCH 1/3] New generic sincosf

[Joseph Myers]

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:

> > glibc is build with -fmerge-all-constants, so constants should already be
> > shared at link time; making constants hidden would be relevant only for
> > arrays, not for individual floating-point numbers (and if the individual
> > constants aren't put in appropriate sections with link-time merging, it's
> > probably because not doing so is more efficient on a particular
> > architecture).
> 
> What do you suggest for x86-64 to avoid array duplication?

Well, a followup patch to refactor the arrays into hidden variables would 
be reasonable once the sincosf patch is in - but it would need 
benchmarking to make sure it doesn't adversely affect performance.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com