ToT build problem with nextafterl/nexttowardl (when using ToT GCC)

[Steve Ellcey]

On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 19:51 +0000, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:

> 

> looks like a gcc bug to me:
> 
> an implementation may provide stricter guarantee (const)
> than what the compiler assumes for the builtins (pure).
> 
> (and i thought functions that may set errno are not pure)

The program in question is being compiled with -fno-math-errno.

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com