Status of pwritev2/preadv2 in glibc?
Adhemerval Zanella
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Tue Apr 25 11:46:00 GMT 2017
On 24/04/2017 14:55, Stephen Bates wrote:
>
>> So far, no one has submitted a patch.
>
> OK, unless I hear that someone else is working on one I will take a look at this.
>
>> I hope the off_t parameter is passed exactly the same way as for pwritev
>> and its 64-bit variant, for all architectures.
>
> Duly noted.
>
> For the kernel peeps I think this makes a case for revisiting the âbig hammerâ control for IO polling since it is going to be a while before applications can utilize the preadv2/pwritev2 approach⦠I will take a look at that too.
>
> Stephen
>
>
I am working on it btw [1]
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-04/msg00461.html
PS: resending with cc to all.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list