[PATCH 03/13] Installed-header hygiene (BZ#20366): missing inclusions A.

[Joseph Myers]

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> On 08/29/2016 09:16 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > These are all fallout from the change from u_intNN_t to uintNN_t; a
> > number of headers now need to include <stdint.h> to pick up those
> > types.  It is possible that __uintNN_t should be used instead.
> 
> Why should __uintNN_t ever be used? At a minimum the uintNN_t types
> should be available regardless of whatever mode you are being compiled in?

ISO C doesn't reserve *_t globally, but unless any of these headers are 
ISO C headers that's not a relevant consideration (and if inappropriate 
*_t types were being added to ISO C headers that would have been detected 
by the conform/ tests).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com