[PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure

[Florian Weimer]

On 09/06/2016 07:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
>> Now that we're in full swing on 2.25 (and I'm not trying to hit a
>> conference deadline), here is an updated version of the explicit_bzero
>> patchset.
>
> Ping.

I think the consensus evolved that we want an explict_bzero and 
__explicit_bzero_chk in libc, not just the inline wrapper.

Thanks,
Florian