[PATCH] Regenerate ULPs for i486 builds.

[Joseph Myers]

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> Why might we be 1-3 ULP worse than the previously checked in baseline?

Because, for the most part, when new tests or libm changes require ulps 
updates, people test for i686/fpu/multiarch and so update that file but 
not this one (the two can have slightly different results for some 
functions because of the different implementations used).  The new tests 
requiring this update were from commit 
c898991d8bcfacc825097ba389ffccc5367c2b2d.

> OK to checkin?

OK.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com