[PATCH v2 1/3] Consolidate fallocate{64} implementations

[Florian Weimer]

On 10/17/2016 08:58 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> Right, I did not take in consideration that fallocate might fall due
> this constraint. The correct approach would be just set as unsupported
> if fallocate returns -1/EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> I will push this patch:

Okay with a suitable changelog entry for both sets of changes.

Thanks,
Florian