[PATCH v2 3/3] Consolidate posix_fadvise implementations

[Joseph Myers]

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> By the way, do you know exactly why mips64n64 requires this symbol versioning?

See what I said in 
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-05/msg00006.html>.  Because 
there were releases with both symbol versions, we need to keep the exports 
at both versions even though they have the same semantics.

Please commit the patch.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com