[PATCH] [BZ 20628] make mallinfo saturating
Paul Eggert
eggert@cs.ucla.edu
Thu Oct 6 21:21:00 GMT 2016
On 10/06/2016 01:43 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Actually, is there really a use for the INTERNAL_SIZE_T abstraction at
> all? I think it might make sense just to replace INTERNAL_SIZE_T by
> size_t everywhere.
Yes, although I think part of the intent was to support a system with
individual arenas limited to 2**32 bytes even on 64-bit platforms, if
nobody needs this capability the code would be simpler without it and
removing it would fix the problem I mentioned. (Another part of the
intent was to support pre-C89 platforms where size_t was a signed type,
but that long ago became unimportant.)
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list