Caching of PID/TID after fork

[Florian Weimer]

On 11/04/2016 05:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 13:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 10/10/2016 08:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> +  /* Some sanity checks for clone syscall: returned ppid should be currernt
>>
>> Typo: “currernt”
>>
>> On its own, this approach looks okay, but I am worried that it sends a message that it's okay to clone processes without additional measures to protect PRNGs and things like that.
>>
>> Florian
>
> I am not sure if you referring you to my initial RFC patch or the one
> complete I sent [1] since you replied to the original thread.

Oh, I'll have a look at the updated patch then.

Florian