Caching of PID/TID after fork

Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com
Fri Nov 4 15:14:00 GMT 2016


On 10/10/2016 08:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> +  /* Some sanity checks for clone syscall: returned ppid should be currernt

Typo: “currernt”

On its own, this approach looks okay, but I am worried that it sends a 
message that it's okay to clone processes without additional measures to 
protect PRNGs and things like that.

Florian



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list